Economize This!

The world through the lens of economics...as told by a humble student.

JANcich & hanDLEY - My Non Econ Stuff

Photos

  • The Bay Bridge
    Kyle and Sarah's Photo Blog

EconBlogs

  • Robert Metcalfe-LSE
  • Vinayak Nagaraj-LSE
  • Econoclasm-Masa Kudamatsu@LSE
Subscribe to this blog's feed

My Informal Publications

  • Are You a Prudent Investor?
  • Don't be Caveman
  • Stocks for the Long Run Mentality is Dangerous

I have a new website

Kyle Handley has a new website at www.econ.umd.edu/~handley  Thanks for getting it done Sarah.

January 17, 2010 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

I have a new website at www.econ.umd.edu/~handley

January 17, 2010 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

We've reached a new low...

Just when you thought the creationists couldn't get any more creative...this. How can these people be so deluded?

Also, why do I always find out about these things from British newspapers?

May 29, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Marriage and income

Good article on the Washington Post today about affluence, marriage, co-habitation and having kids.  From the article:

As marriage with children becomes an exception rather than the norm, social scientists say it is also becoming the self-selected province of the college-educated and the affluent. The working class and the poor, meanwhile, increasingly steer away from marriage, while living together and bearing children out of wedlock.

"The culture is shifting, and marriage has almost become a luxury item, one that only the well educated and well paid are interested in," said Isabel V. Sawhill, an expert on marriage and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Marriage has declined across all income groups, but it has declined far less among couples who make the most money and have the best education. These couples are also less likely to divorce. Many demographers peg the rise of a class-based marriage gap to the erosion since 1970 of the broad-based economic prosperity that followed World War II.

"We seem to be reverting to a much older pattern, when elites marry and a great many others live together and have kids," said Peter Francese, demographic trends analyst for Ogilvy & Mather, an advertising firm.

There are some testable claims in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th paragraphs that would probably make a good research paper, or maybe three research papers.  I'm sure there are economists that have been looking at this, but the experts in the article are all from the sociology side.

March 04, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

WorkingPaper.net - from the people that brought you Econgrads.com

Chris Silvey has a post over on his blog about a new tool from John Morrow of econgrads.com.  It's called WorkingPaper.net.  This is a networking site to facilitate the exchange of referee reports on early stage working papers.  This has the potential to be really cool.  Thanks to Chris for the heads up.

January 12, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

The Home Market Effect

A well-known result in international trade theory is the home market effect.  It's the idea that exporters will prefer to use a large home market as an export platform.  An effect that can be amplified by both high trade barriers.  It can also work contrary to traditional notions of comparative advantage in factor endowments or productivity.  So what happens when border security is stepped up along the US-Mexico border after September 11th?  Domestic marijuana production goes up according to this article.  Sounds like a home market effect to me.  I wonder what will happen after we build that wall?

December 19, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Are you a US citizen?

Then answer these questions....

Why does the United States have three branches of government?
Name two rights that are only for US citizens?
Name two cabinet-level positions?
Name one important idea found in the Declaration of  Independence?
What does the Constitution do?
Who is the speaker of the House of Representatives now?

Those are all new draft questions on a potential revised test for citizenship.  More info is here and here.

Here some questions with answers???? from the LA Times:

Prospective civics questions

  • What does the Constitution do?
    (It sets up the government. It protects basic rights of Americans.)

  • Who was president during World War I? (Woodrow Wilson).

  • Why do we have three branches of government? (So that no branch is too powerful).

  • Name one example of checks and balances.
    (The president vetoes a bill. Congress can confirm or not confirm a president's
    nomination. Congress approves the president's budget. The Supreme Court strikes
    down a law.)

  • Why do we have 13 stripes on the flag? (There were 13 original colonies)

  • Name one thing only the federal government can do.
    (Print money. Declare war. Create an army. Make treaties.)

  • What is one thing only a state government can do?
    (Provide education, police protection, fire protection; grant a driver's license,
    or approve zoning and land use.)

  • What is the current minimum wage in the U.S.? ($5.15)

  • When must all males register for the Selective Service? (At age 18)

  • Name one responsibility that is only for U.S. citizens. (Vote. Serve on a jury.)


Can natural born Americans answer these questions correctly?  I doubt many of them could.  In fact, I find many of the questions and answers ambiguous.  What does the Constiution do?  It sits in the National Archives.  Nothing, it's an inanimate object.  It lies flat.  Probably a difficult question semantically for people that speak native English, let alone as a second language. 

Apparently, "they" don't want people to just memorize historical facts.  I guess "they" haven't been to a high school government class.  I just find all this a rather annoying waste of government time and resources and I thought I would blog about it.

December 01, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

How do you solve the negative externality caused by 4x4s?

With a tax, of course.  London's Mayor Ken Livingstone unveiled plans to charge the heaviest C02 emitters GBP25 per day to enter central London's congestion charge zone.  That's about $48 a day to drive your SUV into central London.  The congestion charge has been around for a while.  Smaller duty vehicles only pay GBP8 and hybrids get in for free.

Is driving an SUV causing a negative externality?  According to Mayor Ken in this Guardian piece:

"One in five vehicles is a Band G," he said. "It is the heaviest concentration in the country and one has to ask why people need four wheel drives in the most densely populated part of the UK. People are waking up to the fact we are bequeathing our children and our grandchildren appalling consequences if we don't act."

I tend to agree with this case.  I think some US cities might have to start doing this in the future.  But public transport networks will have to get better and congestion will have to get worse before it can be a political reality.  Some progressive mayor will give it shot though.

If Robert Metcalfe is still reading, maybe he'll have something to say. UPDATE:  Actually, he already did have a post about week back about Richmond's plan to charge higher prices for parking permits here.  A similar objective, but different policy prescription than that above.  And now he's got something about this specific policy too.

November 15, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Big Princeton Univ. Press Sale

There is a big sale on at the PUP.  Visit this link for all the economics titles.  A number of textbooks are on offer and some good field works too.  (e.g. Debraj Ray's Development Economics and Feenstra's Adv. International Trade, Hayashi's Econometrics, etc.).  Some of these may be cheaper on Amazon, but some not.  US and Canada only.

November 12, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Elections

I was going to write a post about the elections, but I am a bit short on time this week.  Thankfully, the Guardian found the words for me with it's leader for Nov. 9, "Thank you, America"

"...the results change the political landscape in Washington for the final two years of this now thankfully diminished presidency. They also reassert a different and better United States that can again offer hope instead of despair to the world. Donald Rumsfeld's resignation last night was a fitting climax to the voters' verdict. Thank you, America.

In US domestic terms, the 2006 midterms bring to an end the 12 intensely divisive years of Republican House rule that began under Newt Gingrich in 1994. These have been years of zealously and confrontational conservative politics that have shocked the world and, under Mr Bush, have sent America's global standing plummeting. That long political hurricane has now at last blown itself out for a while, but not before leaving America with a terrible legacy that includes climate-change denial, the end of biological stem-cell research, an aid programme tied to abortion bans, a shockingly permissive gun culture, an embrace of capital punishment equalled only by some of the world's worst tyrannies, the impeachment of Bill Clinton and his replacement by a president who does not believe in Darwin's theory of evolution. The approval by voters in at least five more states of same-sex marriage bans - on top of 13 similar votes in 2004 - shows that culture-war politics are far from over."

I could not have said it better.  Thank you, Guardian.  The whole story is here.

November 09, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

»

Recent Posts

  • I have a new website
  • I have a new website
  • We've reached a new low...
  • Marriage and income
  • WorkingPaper.net - from the people that brought you Econgrads.com
  • The Home Market Effect
  • Are you a US citizen?
  • How do you solve the negative externality caused by 4x4s?
  • Big Princeton Univ. Press Sale
  • Elections

What I'm reading

  • George Orwell: Homage to Catalonia

    George Orwell: Homage to Catalonia

  • George Orwell: Down and Out in Paris and London

    George Orwell: Down and Out in Paris and London

  • George Orwell: The Road to Wigan Pier (Penguin Modern Classics)

    George Orwell: The Road to Wigan Pier (Penguin Modern Classics)

  • George Orwell: Keep the Aspidistra Flying
  • Fujita, Krugman and Venables: The Spatial economy

    Fujita, Krugman and Venables: The Spatial economy

  • : american heritage dictionary

    american heritage dictionary

Links

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • London School of Economics
  • econphd.net
  • Organization for Computational Neurosciences
  • University of Maryland-College Park

Archives

  • January 2010
  • May 2007
  • March 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 01/2004